Why the study?
Does the C(-260)-->T polymorphism in the CD14 gene increase the risk of myocardial infarction in men?
Does the C(-260)-->T polymorphism in the CD14 gene increase the risk of myocardial infarction in men?
The T(-260) allele in the CD14 receptor gene promoter is associated with increased CD14 receptor density and a significantly higher risk of myocardial infarction in men.
T allele associated with higher MI risk in men; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: The CD14 receptor of monocytes is an important mediator for the activation of monocytes/macrophages by endotoxins from the envelope of Gram-negative bacteria (lipopolysaccharides). We identified a polymorphism in the CD14 receptor and examined whether this genetic marker influenced the expression of the CD14 receptor on monocytes and affected the predisposition to myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified a C(-260)-->T nucleotide change, creating a HaeIII polymorphism in the promoter of the CD14 gene. The polymorphism was determined in 178 male patients <65 years old (cases; average age, 55.9+/-6.3 years) at the time of their first myocardial infarction and in 135 representative selected male control subjects (controls; average age, 55.2+/-11.5 years). The frequency of the T allele (absence of the cutting site) was 0.49 in cases and 0.35 in controls (P=0.0005; OR, 1.781; 95% CI, 1.286 to 2.465). Subsequently, we measured the expression of monocyte CD14 by flow cytometry in 18 volunteers with different CD14 genotypes. A significantly higher density of the CD14 receptor was shown in the T/T homozygotes than in the others (P=0.0028). CONCLUSIONS: A higher frequency of allele T(-260) in the promoter of the CD14 receptor gene was found in myocardial infarction survivors than in controls. At the same time, this variation was associated with a higher density of CD14 receptors in healthy volunteers. Therefore, we can conclude that in addition to the well-established risk factors, a genetically determined reaction of monocytes/macrophages to infectious stimuli could play an important role in the process of atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hubáček et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: