Why the study?
Does intravenous atropine induce advanced A-V block in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Does intravenous atropine induce advanced A-V block in patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction?
Atropine administration in acute inferior myocardial infarction may paradoxically worsen A-V block, potentially identifying a subset of patients who require prophylactic pacing.
May worsen AV block in acute inferior MI; leaves open whether it identifies patients needing prophylactic pacing.
The degree of A-V block increased after intravenous administration of atropine in 10 nondigitalized patients with acute inferior myocardial infarction who had narrow QRS complexes during periods of 1:1 A-V conduction. Short episodes of 3:1, 4:1 and 5:1 A-V block were seen to emerge: (a) in 6 patients, directly from Wenckebach periods; (b) in 3 patients, from alternating Wenckebach periods; and (c) in 1 patient, from a 3:2 Wenckebach period which led to a short-lived alternating Wenckebach period. Apparently, the predominance of the chronotropic effects on the sinus node over the dromotropic effects on the A-V node led to a tachycardia-dependent (more ischemic than vagal) process, exposing or producing multi- (two, three or four) level block involving the A-V node (and perhaps the His bundle). Subsequently, therapeutic pacing was instituted in 9/10 patients because they developed spontaneous symptomatic advanced A-V block. Therefore, it is possible that the early effects of atropine identified a narrowly-defined subset of patients in whom prophylactic pacing may be indicated. However, more studies are necessary to corroborate these assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castellanos et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: