A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, non-flagellated, coccoid, ovoid or rod-shaped bacterial strain, TSTF-M16 T , was isolated from a tidal flat on the Yellow Sea, Republic of Korea. The neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain TSTF-M16 T fell within a clade comprising the type strains of Sulfitobacter species. Strain TSTF-M16 T exhibited 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of 98.5 and 98.1 % to the type strains of Sulfitobacter mediterraneus and Sulfitobacter sabulilitoris , respectively, and 96.2–97.8 % to the type strains of the other Sulfitobacter species. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between the genomic sequences of strain TSTF-M16 T and the type strains of 16 Sulfitobacter species were 70.6–74.2 and 17.9–19.0 %, respectively. The DNA G+C content of strain TSTF-M16 T from genomic sequence data was 59.26 mol%. Strain TSTF-M16 T contained Q-10 as the predominant ubiquinone and C 18 : 1 ω 7 c as the major fatty acid. The major polar lipids of strain TSTF-M16 T were phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylglycerol, one unidentified aminolipid and one unidentified lipid. Distinguished phenotypic properties, together with the phylogenetic and genetic distinctiveness, revealed that strain TSTF-M16 T is separated from recognized Sulfitobacter species. On the basis of the data presented here, strain TSTF-M16 T is considered to represent a novel species of the genus Sulfitobacter , for which the name Sulfitobacter aestuariivivens sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is TSTF-M16 T (=KACC 21645 T =NBRC 114501 T ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: