This paper describes the reaction of the phosphine-protected Au nanoparticle Au(55)(PPh(3))(12)Cl(6) (1, "Au55") with hexanethiol (2) and other thiols. The voltammetry of the reaction product 2 displays a well-defined pattern of peaks qualitatively reminiscent of Au(38) nanoparticles, but with quite different spacing (0.74 +/- 0.01 V) between the potentials of initial oxidation and reduction steps (electrochemical gap). Correction of this "molecule-like" gap for charging energy indicates a HOMO-LUMO gap energy of about 0.47 V. Voltammetry of the products (3 and 4) of reaction of 1 with C(3)H(7)SH and PhC(2)H(4)SH, respectively, is similar. Laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (LDI-MS) shows that 2 contains a high proportion of a core mass in the 14-15 kDa range, which is proposed to be Au(75). UV-vis spectra of 2-4 are relatively featureless, similar to previous reports of thiolate-protected Au(75) nanoparticles. HPLC analysis of 2 shows a Au(75) content of ca. 73%; the electrochemical purity estimate is also high, about 55%. Combining the mass spectrometric result with thermogravimetric analysis of 2 leads to a preliminary formulation Au(75)(SC(6)H(13))(40). This Au(75) synthesis complements a previous Brust-type synthesis and is unusual in the apparent provocation in the reaction of an increase in core size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balasubramanian et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: