Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The advent of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) has greatly improved the precision and accuracy of bone-mineral density determinations in research and in clinical practice (1). Because the current generation of DEXA machines can also identify soft tissue and categorize it as fat or lean, there has been a great deal of interest in using DEXA for measurement of these compartments as well. At several conferences we have now heard the conclusion that DEXA is a ‘ ‘gold standard’ ‘ for body-composition research involving noncalcified tissues, and not solely for bone-density research. We suggest that caution be used before DEXA be adopted uncritically for this purpose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roubenoff et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: