Why the study?
Data on the clinical profile and CIED infection risk associated with non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci bacteremia in patients with CIED have been limited.
Does device removal reduce 1-year mortality in patients with CIED infection due to non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci bacteremia?
Does device removal reduce 1-year mortality in patients with CIED infection due to non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci bacteremia?
Non-Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci bacteremia in CIED patients carries a high rate of device infection (56.3%), particularly with CoNS, Enterococcus, and VGS, though the mortality benefit of device extraction requires larger studies to confirm.
Non-SA GPC bacteremia in CIED patients may indicate device infection; leaves open optimal management strategies pending prospective data.
Background Cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection carries significant morbidity and mortality with bacteremia being a possible marker of device infection. A clinical profile of non– Staphylococcus aureus gram-positive cocci (non-SA GPC) bacteremia in patients with CIED has been limited. Objective To examine characteristics of patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia and risk of CIED infection. Methods We reviewed all patients with CIED who developed non-SA GPC bacteremia at the Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2019. The 2019 European Heart Rhythm Association Consensus Document was used to define CIED infection. Results A total of 160 patients with CIED developed non-SA GPC bacteremia. CIED infection was present in 90 (56.3%) patients, in whom 60 (37.5%) were classified as definite and 30 (18.8%) as possible. This included 41 (45.6%) cases of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS), 30 (33.3%) cases of Enterococcus , 13 (14.4%) cases of viridans group streptococci (VGS), and 6 (6.7%) cases of other organisms. The adjusted odds of CIED infection in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus , and VGS bacteremia were 19-, 14-, and 15-fold higher, respectively, as compared with other non-SA GPC. In patients with CIED infection, the reduction in risk of 1-year mortality associated with device removal was not statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval 0.26–1.33; P = .198). Conclusions The prevalence of CIED infection in non-SA GPC bacteremia was higher than previously reported, particularly in cases due to CoNS, Enterococcus species, and VGS. However, a larger cohort is needed to demonstrate the benefit of CIED extraction in patients with infected CIED due to non-SA GPC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chesdachai et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: