The first comprehensive phylogenetic study of the wasp tribe C ryptini ( H ymenoptera, I chneumonidae, C ryptinae) is presented, based on 109 morphological characters and molecular data from seven loci. The dataset includes 370 species, 308 of which are from C ryptini, covering 182 of its 250 genera. Results from parsimony and likelihood analyses are generally congruent. The topology has several implications for ichneumonid higher‐level classification. Previous definitions of the I chneumoniformes clade are supported, though newly including the M icroleptinae. The cryptine subtribe A teleutina is consistently recovered outside of the C ryptini clade and should be treated as a separate subfamily, A teleutinae stat.n. The tribe P hygadeuontini is shown to be polyphyletic: while most of the sampled taxa were recovered in a single clade, many of its members are more closely related to the I chneumoninae, A teleutinae or C ryptini. Pending a more detailed study, the group should be treated as a separate subfamily, P hygadeuontinae stat. rev . The former H emigastrini are recovered as largely monophyletic but with important exceptions. H emigaster B rullé is recovered as part of the P hygadeuontini and is transferred to that group. E chthrus G ravenhorst is consistently recovered as part of C ryptini, rendering A ptesini as the correct name for the tribe. The subfamily C ryptinae should be restricted to the tribes A ptesini and C ryptini. Within C ryptini, the results show little support for the current subtribal classification, with most subtribes recovered as polyphyletic. A number of relatively stable clades are identified and discussed, but the relationships among them are weakly supported. Most of these clades are morphologically heterogeneous and building a subtribal classification based on them would be ineffectual; they are therefore treated under the informal designation of genus groups. The results highlight the ubiquity of morphological homoplasy in C ryptini, and provide a framework from which to address further systematic and evolutionary questions on this hyperdiverse group of parasitic wasps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernardo F. Santos (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: