Why the study?
Does a single-camera noncontact method accurately measure ballistocardiogram and photoplethysmogram compared to an accelerometer-based reference?
Does a single-camera noncontact method accurately measure ballistocardiogram and photoplethysmogram compared to an accelerometer-based reference?
A single camera can simultaneously monitor ballistocardiogram and photoplethysmogram without requiring subjects to wear extra equipment.
May enable contactless BCG/PPG monitoring; leaves open clinical validation against references.
We present a noncontact method to measure ballistocardiogram (BCG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) simultaneously using a single camera. The method tracks the motion of facial features to determine displacement BCG, and extracts the corresponding velocity and acceleration BCGs by taking first and second temporal derivatives from the displacement BCG, respectively. The measured BCG waveforms are consistent with those reported in the literature and also with those recorded with an accelerometer-based reference method. The method also tracks PPG based on the reflected light from the same facial region, which makes it possible to track both BCG and PPG with the same optics. We verify the robustness and reproducibility of the noncontact method with a small pilot study with 23 subjects. The presented method is the first demonstration of simultaneous BCG and PPG monitoring without wearing any extra equipment or marker by the subject.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: