PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1989The Journal of Urology113 citations

Cystine Calculi—Rough and Smooth: A New Clinical Distinction

View Full Paper
KBKrishna M. BhattaEPEdwin L. PrienSDStephen P. Dretler

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Four stones each from 2 populations of cystine calculi, 1 with a rough external surface (cystine-R) and the other smooth (cystine-S), were studied for their crystal structure with stereoscopic and scanning electron microscopy. Two stones each of cystine-R and cystine-S, calcium oxalate monohydrate, calcium oxalate dihydrate, struvite plus apatite and brushite were fragmented with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and the fragmentability was compared. Fragments resulting from cystine-R and cystine-S extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy were examined under the stereoscope to assess the plane of cleavage or fracture. Results show that cystine-R stones are comprised of well formed blocks of hexagonal crystals, whereas cystine-S calculi have small, irregular and poorly formed interlacing crystals. The center of cystine-R stones was similar to that of the periphery but the center of cystine-S stones was formed of blocks of hexagons similar to but smaller than the cystine-R calculi. Fragmentation with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy revealed that cystine-S stones are the least fragile, calcium oxalate dihydrate and struvite plus apatite were the most fragile, and cystine-R, brushite and calcium oxalate monohydrate calculi were in the intermediate fragility range. The possibility of the patient having a cystine-R calculus should be considered during therapeutic procedures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bhatta et al. (1989) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a724cbcfebe604dd70a88ddhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38946-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper