Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixture properties of the transient fuel spray injected by group-hole nozzles were quantitatively studied in a constant volume chamber via the laser absorption scattering (LAS) technique, and compared with conventional single-hole nozzles. Specific areas investigated included non-evaporating and evaporating ambient conditions, and the conditions of free spray and spray impinging on a flat wall. The particular emphasis was on the effect of one of the key parameters of the group-hole nozzle structure, namely, the interval between orifices. Subsequently, in-cylinder ignition and combustion processes were investigated by direct flame visualization in a single-cylinder optical research engine using the group-hole nozzle and the standard multi-hole nozzle, together with heat release analysis. Results show that the group-hole nozzle can produce a smaller Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of droplets under the non-evaporating condition. Under the evaporating condition, for the free spray cases, there exists a trade-off between the fuel evaporation and the spray penetration in the application of the group-hole nozzle. With the increase in interval between orifices, the ratio of evaporation increases, but the spray tip penetration decreases. For the spray impinging on a flat wall, the group-hole nozzle can enhance the spray tip penetrations to some extent compared with the single-hole nozzles. Flame images taken in a direct injection optical engine show that the enhancement of the fuel atomization and evaporation by the group-hole nozzle may contribute to a decrease in overall flame luminosity level, suggesting reduced soot formation in diesel engines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: