The concepts of natural selection and competition are distinguished, and the competition coefficients are rigorously defined; r-selection is not relevant to competition, but K-selection is a consequence of exploitative competition wherein consumers and resources are directly interconvertible. When only a single resource limits a population, competition coefficients are proportional to the ratio of saturation densities and are reciprocal. When several limiting resources exist, competition coefficients must be ≤1 and competitive exclusion will not occur. Under exploitative competition K and competitive ability are inversely related. Alpha-selection is defined as the evolutionary process by which competitive ability increases and refers to the acquisition of interference phenomena whereby individuals impair the reproductive rate dN/Ndt of competitors. Possession of interference mechanisms may require adjustments of energy budgets, so that α-selection is a mechanism of evolutionary reduction of r and K. Interference competition results in competitive exclusion because the competition coefficients are nonreciprocal and >1. Alpha-selection can occur at either low or high density, and hence may be a ubiquitous force in evolution. It is concluded that species dominance in competition can not in principle be predicted from knowledge of r or K alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas E. Gill (1974) studied this question.