Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a comparison of the effects of ozonation [0.4–3.0 mg ozone (O3)/mg (DOC)] and titanium dioxide–catalyzed ozonation (TiO2-O3) (0.4–3.0 mg O3/mg DOC; 1.0 mg TiO2/L) at pH 7.46 on the removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from groundwater from the central Banat region (northern Serbia). This groundwater is rich in NOM (9.85 mg/L DOC), which is mostly of hydrophobic character (65% fulvic acid, 14% humic acid fraction). Ozonation and TiO2-O3 resulted in almost identical degrees of DOC content reduction (up to 30%), with the maximum efficacy of both processes achieved with 3.0 mg O3/mg DOC. The application of oxidation treatments resulted in complete humic acid oxidation, and increased the content of the hydrophilic fraction (up to 72%). The use of TiO2-O3 did not result in an improvement in the removal of trihalomethane precursors in comparison with ozonation (up to 48%) but produced less brominated species, whereas use of the TiO2-O3 process resulted in better removal of haloacetonitrile precursors (up to 44% removal) than did ozonation, which had less effect.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jazić et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: