Why the study?
Does a new cardiac electrical biomarker (CEB) accurately detect electrocardiogram changes suggestive of acute myocardial ischemic injury compared to standard ST voltage changes and computerized algorithms?
Does a new cardiac electrical biomarker (CEB) accurately detect electrocardiogram changes suggestive of acute myocardial ischemic injury compared to standard ST voltage changes and computerized algorithms?
A novel cardiac electrical biomarker derived from three ECG leads provides high diagnostic accuracy for detecting acute myocardial ischemic injury, comparable or superior to standard ST segment analysis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CEB shows high diagnostic accuracy for acute ischemic injury; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: A new cardiac "electrical" biomarker (CEB) for detection of 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) changes indicative of acute myocardial ischemic injury has been identified. Objective was to test CEB diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: This is a blinded, observational retrospective case-control, noninferiority study. A total of 508 ECGs obtained from archived digital databases were interpreted by cardiologist and emergency physician (EP) blinded reference standards for presence of acute myocardial ischemic injury. CEB was constructed from three ECG cardiac monitoring leads using nonlinear modeling. Comparative active controls included ST voltage changes (J-point, ST area under curve) and a computerized ECG interpretive algorithm (ECGI). Training set of 141 ECGs identified CEB cutoffs by receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis. Test set of 367 ECGs was analyzed for validation. Poor-quality ECGs were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values were calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Adjudication was performed by consensus. RESULTS: CEB demonstrated noninferiority to all active controls by hypothesis testing. CEB adjudication demonstrated 85.3-94.4% sensitivity, 92.5-93.0% specificity, 93.8-98.6% negative predictive value, and 74.6-83.5% positive predictive value. CEB was superior against all active controls in EP analysis, and against ST area under curve and ECGI by cardiologist. CONCLUSION: CEB detects acute myocardial ischemic injury with high diagnostic accuracy. CEB is instantly constructed from three ECG leads on the cardiac monitor and displayed instantly allowing immediate cost-effective identification of patients with acute ischemic injury during cardiac rhythm monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schreck et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: