Why the study?
Endothelial dysfunction links obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome with cardiovascular diseases, but the impact of patient serum-derived extracellular vesicles on endothelial function was unclear.
FASN-enriched extracellular vesicles from patients with obstructive sleep apnea drive endothelial dysfunction, identifying a novel molecular mechanism and potential therapeutic target for associated cardiovascular complications.
EVs from OSAHS patients may impair endothelial function via fatty acid metabolism; hypothesis-generating for targeted CVD therapies.
Endothelial dysfunction is a key factor linking obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) with cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we used advanced proteomics and metabolomics approaches to investigate the impact of extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from the serum of OSAHS patients on endothelial function. Our multi-omics analysis identified dysregulated pathways related to fatty acid metabolism, apoptosis regulation, and inflammatory responses, highlighting fatty acid synthase (FASN) as a crucial player in OSAHS-induced endothelial dysfunction. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that FASN-enriched EVs impair endothelial cell viability and disrupt metabolic homeostasis, offering new insights for the development of targeted therapies for cardiovascular complications associated with OSAHS. • First identification of the pivotal role of FASN-enriched EVs in OSAHS-related endothelial dysfunction. • Unveiling dysregulated pathways in fatty acid metabolism, apoptosis, and inflammation in OSAHS. • Demonstration of the harmful impact of FASN-enriched EVs on endothelial cell viability. • Novel insights into the molecular mechanisms driving OSAHS-induced endothelial dysfunction. • Valuable implications for targeted therapeutic strategies in managing OSAHS-associated cardiovascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: