This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Epigenetically switched, proliferative vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs) form neointima, engendering stenotic diseases. Histone-3 lysine-27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and acetylation (H3K27ac) marks are associated with gene repression and activation, respectively. The polycomb protein embryonic ectoderm development (EED) reads H3K27me3 and also enhances its deposition, hence is a canonical gene repressor. However, herein we found an unexpected role for EED in activating the bona fide pro-proliferative gene Ccnd1 (cyclinD1). EED overexpression in SMCs increased Ccnd1 mRNA, seemingly contradicting its gene-repressing function. However, consistently, EED co-immunoprecipitated with gene-activating H3K27ac reader BRD4, and they co-occupied at both mitogen-activated Ccnd1 and mitogen-repressed P57 ( bona fide anti-proliferative gene), as indicated by chromatin immunoprecipitation qPCR. These results were abolished by an inhibitor of either the EED/H3K27me3 or BRD4/H3K27ac reader function. In accordance, elevating BRD4 increased H3K27me3. In vivo , while EED was upregulated in rat and human neointimal lesions, selective EED inhibition abated angioplasty-induced neointima and reduced cyclinD1 in rat carotid arteries. Thus, results uncover a previously unknown role for EED in Ccnd1 activation, likely via its cooperativity with BRD4 that enhances each other's reader function; i.e., activating pro-proliferative Ccnd1 while repressing anti-proliferative P57 . As such, this study confers mechanistic implications for the epigenetic intervention of neointimal pathology.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: