Why the study?
Is the proctometrogram a reproducible method for measuring rectal distensibility in patients?
Is the proctometrogram a reproducible method for measuring rectal distensibility in patients?
The proctometrogram is a highly reproducible method for measuring rectal distensibility, making it reliable for clinical practice and research.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports proctometrogram reproducibility in research; leaves open clinical adoption pending larger validation studies.
The reproducibility of a method of measuring rectal distensibility by continuous controlled fluid inflation with a balloon has been evaluated in 15 patients. The volume at sensation threshold, constant sensation and maximal tolerance, the pressures at these volumes and rectal compliance were measured. The mean coefficients of variation of the seven variables measured ranged from 4.7%-7.9%. The expected correlation between rectal compliance and maximal tolerable volume was confirmed (r = 0.85, p less than 0.001). The high reproducibility makes this investigation reliable for use in clinical practice and research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varma et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: