Key result
Bilateral high-frequency hearing loss linked to up to ~3.8-fold higher hypertension risk in noise-exposed workers.
Cross-Sectional
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of bilateral high-frequency hearing loss (BHFHL) with blood pressure and hypertension among occupational noise exposed workers. METHODS: Occupational noise exposed workers were enrolled in 2017 from the occupational diseases survey of Chengdu. BHFHL was classified as normal, mild, or high by the bilateral high-frequency tone average. Linear regression model was used to assess the effects of occupational noise exposure time and BHFHL on blood pressure. Logistic regression model was performed to estimate hypertension risk odds ratios (ORs) associated to occupational noise exposure time and BHFHL. RESULTS: Increasing years of occupational noise exposure and BHFHL were significantly associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure increase (all P<0.001). The lineal trend was only significant in males, with adjusted ORs for hypertension gradually increasing with increasing years of occupational noise exposure (P<0.001). Furthermore, subjects having mild and high BHFHL had a higher hypertension risk of 34% and 281%, respectively (both P<0.001). Dose-response relationship between BHFHL and hypertension was found in both males and females. CONCLUSIONS: Occupational noise exposure was positively associated with blood pressure levels and hypertension risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuang et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Elevated blood pressure and hypertension in occupational noise-exposed workers. Bilateral high-frequency hearing loss (BHFHL) and occupational noise exposure vs. Normal bilateral high-frequency tone average was evaluated on Hypertension risk and blood pressure levels (p=<0.001). Mild and high bilateral high-frequency hearing loss in noise-exposed workers increased hypertension risk by 34% and 281%, respectively (both P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: