This article provides an analysis of the ethnological works of James Cowles Prichard (1786–1848), who devoted his scholarly life to tracing the origins of different “races” and explaining the perceived physical differences between them. By contextualizing Prichard’s work within the broader landscape of knowledge production through the reconstruction of a citation network, his pivotal role in mediating between physiological and philological knowledge becomes evident. Through an analysis of Prichard’s work, focusing on the intersections between physiological and philological knowledge, or between taxonomical and historical-genealogical modes of classification, this article aims to illuminate the complexities and tensions inherent in the emergent racial discourse of the early nineteenth century.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefan Poland (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: