Why the study?
ADMA is a risk marker for cardiovascular events and mortality, but plasma or serum analysis may be hampered by pre-analytical sample handling.
Is a dried blood spot assay for ADMA and L-arginine reliable and clinically valid for assessing cardiovascular risk markers in field studies?
Is a dried blood spot assay for ADMA and L-arginine reliable and clinically valid for assessing cardiovascular risk markers in field studies?
A novel dried blood spot assay for ADMA and L-arginine is reliable and clinically valid, facilitating field studies of these cardiovascular risk markers.
DBS assay enables reliable ADMA measurement; leaves open its utility for cardiometabolic risk assessment in larger cohorts.
Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) inhibits nitric oxide (NO) synthesis. It is a risk marker for cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with cardiometabolic diseases and in population-based studies. Plasma or serum analysis of ADMA may be hampered by pre-analytical sample handling. We validated a dried blood spot (DBS) assay for ADMA and L-arginine and show here that this assay has excellent variabilities and reproducibilities. Filter paper is impregnated with the arginase inhibitor nor-NOHA (Nω-hydroxy-nor-Arginine) to avoid L-arginine degradation. Clinical validation of this DBS assay confirms elevated ADMA concentration in hemodialysis patients as compared to healthy controls, higher ADMA concentrations in men versus women, and elevated L-arginine concentration in subjects supplemented with L-arginine. The DBS assay was used in a cohort study involving 100 primarily healthy subjects in the Andean region to assess the impact of chronic intermittent hypoxia on ADMA and L-arginine; ADMA DBS concentration at sea level was prospectively associated with pulmonary hypertension after six months of exposure to 3500 m. In a cohort of 753 individuals, L-arginine/ADMA ratio significantly decreased with increasing number of traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Analysis of ADMA and L-arginine in DBS is a reliable and reproducible method for quantitation of these markers in field studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannemann et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: