Why the study?
Given the recent introduction of sutureless and rapid-deployment valves, current evidence on sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement has been limited.
Does sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SURD-AVR) provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease?
Does sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SURD-AVR) provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with aortic valve disease?
Real-world registry data demonstrates that sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement is a safe and effective alternative to conventional surgery, offering high technical success, low in-hospital mortality, and facilitating minimally invasive approaches.
The treatment options for patients with aortic valve disease have considerably expanded over the last decade. The remarkable advances in catheter-based technology, the popularizing of minimally invasive (MI) surgery, and the introduction of new valve technologies, such as sutureless and rapid-deployment (SURD) valves have led to a paradigm shift in the management of aortic valve pathologies. Yet, given their recent introduction, the current evidence on sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement (SURD-AVR) has been limited thus far. The Sutureless and Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement International Registry (SURD-IR) was established in 2015 by a consortium of 18 research centers to assess safety, efficacy, short- and long-term outcomes of SURD-AVR interventions. The present keynote lecture aims to assess and comment on the real-world evidence for SURD-AVR surgery generated from the SURD-IR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eusanio et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: