Why the study?
Neuraxial anesthesia offers many benefits in the obstetric population, prompting an evaluation of obstetric anesthesia trends and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact the rates of general versus neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric patients?
Does the COVID-19 pandemic impact the rates of general versus neuraxial anesthesia in obstetric patients?
The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significant decrease in the use of general anesthesia for cesarean sections in favor of neuraxial anesthesia.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
GA rates and NA-to-GA conversions in obstetrics warrant ongoing monitoring; leaves open COVID-19 effects on practice patterns.
There are many benefits of neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in the obstetric population. We performed a retrospective analysis of anesthesia provided to obstetric patients in the tertiary care center between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2020 and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on anesthetic practice. A total of 15,930 anesthesia procedures were performed. A total of 2182 (17.52%) cesarean sections (CS) required general anesthesia (GA), including 383 (3.07%) of emergency conversion from NA. NA for CS consisted of 9971 (80.04%) spinal anesthesia (SA) and 304 (2.44%) epidural anesthesia (EPI). We found a decrease in the GA rate for CS in 2020 (11.87% vs. 14.81%; p < 0.001). The conversion rate from NA to GA for CS was 2.39% for SA and 31.38% for EPI. The conversion rate from labor EPI to SA for CS increased in 2020 (3.10% vs. 1.24%; p < 0.001), as well as the SA rate for other obstetric procedures (61.32%; p < 0.001). We report 2670 NA for vaginal delivery, representing 31.13% of all vaginal deliveries. NA constituted the vast majority of obstetric anesthesia. However, we report a relatively high incidence of GA. There was a decrease in GA use in the obstetric population during the pandemic. Further reduction in GA use is possible, including an avoidable conversion from NA to GA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krawczyk et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: