Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The extent of contamination of soils by toxic heavy metals not only depends on the rate of loading of the metal but also on the nature of the adsorbing surfaces, the degree of alkalinity or acidity of the soil and the presence of aqueous complexant ligands. This work reports on the role of pH on the retention of Cd, Hg, Pb and Zn by two soils and on the influence of the chloride, Cl‐, ion on the chemical speciation and retention of the four metals. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted from pH 3 to 7 in the presence of either 0.1 M LiCl or LiClO4. The results of the study showed that high concentrations of Cl‐ ions can greatly decrease the retention of Hg and have an increasingly lesser effect on Cd, Pb and Zn retention. The effect of the Cl‐ons was directly related to the metal‐Cl formation constants. The results of computer modeling of Cd and Hg retention by goethite and humic acid fractions indicated the relative importance of aqueous vs. surface complexation on metal retention. For organic surfaces, which do not form ternary surface complexes, the presence of aqueous complexant ligands should always decrease the adsorption of the metal. For mineral surfaces, which do form ternary surface complexes, there may be increased or decreased metal retention depending on the formation constant of the aqueous metal‐ligand species, the intrinsic complexation constants for the various binary and ternary complexes of the metal and the concentration of the complexant ligand. Thus for Hg, which forms very strong aqueous species with Cl‐ ions, reduced adsorption on goethite was predicted in the presence of 0.1 M LiCl, while enhanced adsorption was predicted for Cd and Pb. The results suggest caution in the disposal of Cl‐containing wastes onto metal‐contaminated soils. The deleterious effects of Cl‐ ion addition would be greatest for soils with relatively high organic matter contents and low contents of hydrous ferric oxides.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lumsdon et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: