The pinning site inhomogeneities interacting with a domain wall are characterized by the maximum restoring force, f, acting on an area A of domain wall. The critical field, H 0, required to release this area from the pin is given by f/2IA where I is the magnetic moment per unit volume. The area A is not independent of the applied field H and a statistical treatment is required to evaluate it. The Friedel ‘steady state’ model assumes that the volume swept out when a wall breaks away from a pin contains, on average, one replacement pin. This leads to the relation A ∝ 1/H 1/2 and hence to the critical field H 0 = 3ρf 2/(4πγI) where ρ is the pin density and γ is the wall energy per unit area. If the parameter β0 = 3f/(8πγb) > 1, where 4b is the interaction range of the pin, then the Friedel model holds and the pinning is ‘strong'. If β < 1 the Friedel model breaks down and the pinning is ‘weak'. The unpinning process is then no longer connected with unit steps related to breakaway from single pins bu...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P. Gaunt (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: