Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) reports are part of the process for acquiring staff privileges, professional credentials, and licenses throughout a physician's entire career. We surveyed our hospital's 66 residents to assess their understanding of NPDB. Only 9 residents had heard about NPDB. A follow-up survey of the 10 medical schools in Pennsylvania and Maryland showed just 4 schools covered NPDB in their curricula. Finally, we did a third survey--of 1,410 Pennsylvania Medical Society members. Eighty-one percent did not know that denial of initial license application was not a reportable offense; 69% did not know that voluntary entrance into alcohol/drug rehabilitation was not reportable; and 75% did not know that denial of expanded privileges because of level of clinical competence was reportable. Only 13% knew how to obtain their files. Our surveys suggest physicians have a poor understanding of NPDB even though these reports could have career-jeopardizing implications, especially if the Clinton administration expands access to NPDB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ankney et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: