We show that securities issued by a distressed firm, often through exchange offers, provide the most efficient resolution of financial restructuring. Information asymmetry between the firm-bank coalition and small bondholders gives rise to other forms of distress resolution such as refinancing, public workout, and the inefficiency of liquidation. We find that political lobbying by the firm-bank adds to these inefficiencies and inhibits the development of a private market for distressed securities. Cross-country evidence is consistent with this and indicates that improved creditor rights, and the depth of information available to creditors reduce the likelihood of inefficient distress resolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aney et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: