Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We developed a Tele-Airway Management System (TAMS) which contained two high quality videocameras which were set up to view the frontal and lateral parts of the patient. Another endoscopic camera, a videolaryngoscope, was used to view the anatomy of the airway. One patient monitor was used to view the vital signs and there was also a PC terminal. A study was conducted in two separate emergency departments with 33 novice intubators (medical students and interns of the department). Remote consultation was provided by a board certified emergency physician. The time taken to complete endotracheal intubation for the TAMS group was 82.1 s (SE 4.9) and was 103.8 s (SE 7.9) in the videolaryngoscope-only group. The difference was significant (P = 0.03). The success rate of endotracheal intubation within 2 min was 94% for the TAMS group and 63% in the videolaryngoscope-only group (P = 0.04). With a wireless communication system, the TAMS could be installed in an ambulance, which might allow paramedics to perform safe and effective airway management in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chung et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: