Why the study?
Does individual variation in platelet aggregation justify tailored antiplatelet therapy in patients after cardiovascular surgery?
Does individual variation in platelet aggregation justify tailored antiplatelet therapy in patients after cardiovascular surgery?
Individual variation in platelet aggregation suggests that antiplatelet therapy indications and dosages should be tailored to each patient to prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications after cardiovascular surgery.
Platelet hyperaggregability was associated with thrombosis and hypoaggregability with bleeding after cardiovascular surgery; leaves open whether tailored antiplatelet therapy improves outcomes.
Platelet aggregation was studied in 670 samples of 20 healthy controls and 279 patients in the late period after cardiovascular surgery.Aggregating agents used were 0.5 and 2.0μM ADP as well as 2mM arachidonic acid (AA).Among the healthy controls, a maximum aggregation rate over 18% (ADP 0.5μM) was considered hyperaggregability, those under 47% (ADP 2μM) or under 78% (AA 2mM) considered hypoaggregability.Maximum aggregation rate in patients not given antiplatelet agents widely varied from hyperaggregability to hypoaggregability. There was a positive correlation botween the first sample and the second one gained from each patient. This suggested that individual variation existed on platelet aggregation.Maximum aggregation rate significantly decreased by ticlopidine for ADP and by aspirin for AA. Both ADP and AA should be used for platelet aggregation.Comparison among three groups of different ticlopidine doses revealed that the doses should be decided on the basis of platelet aggregation for each patient.Thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications were observed in only 9 cases. Four of 7 cases of thrombotic complication showed hyperaggregability and only 1 case showed hypoaggregability. Both cases of hemorrhagic complication showed hypoaggregability.These findings suggest that indication for antiplatelet therapy and doses of antiplatelet agent should be decided in consideration of individual variation on platelet aggregation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshimasa Tsushima (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: