This overview highlights the diagnostic challenges of pulmonary embolism and the utility of clinical assessment and D-dimer testing in emergency settings.
Reinforces clinical assessment plus D-dimer for emergency PE evaluation; leaves open need for updated prospective validation.
Pulmonary embolism is a lethal yet treatable disease. Given the significant overlap of symptoms and signs between the presentation of pulmonary embolism and acute coronary syndromes, it becomes clear that emergency room physicians must be familiar with the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. A critical issue is always to consider pulmonary embolism in the differential diagnosis of chest pain. However, the clinical diagnosis of pulmonary embolism remains problematic due to the nonspecific presenting symptoms, signs, electrocardiographic abnormalities, arterial blood gas and chest X-ray findings. D-dimers are becoming a widely available useful laboratory tool in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism. In this concise overview, the diagnostic value of clinical assessment in patients with possible pulmonary embolism will be explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kranidis et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: