Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Throughout the long time period of the Middle Ages, legal authority regarded women as "girls." Officially, adult women were not able to perform as judges or advocates or in any official capacity in a court of law. Nor were they able to bring suit themselves except in special circumstances such as rape cases. Rather, they were required to be represented by another person before the law which controlled key aspects of their lives. This other person might be a father if the woman were young and unmarried, or a husband if she were a wife, or a close male relative if neither husband nor father were living. One measure of women's progress in the development of medieval law is the increasing control she had over her choice of guardian and the recourse she had if he were unfair or unjust. 1 Yet this principle of representation, called Munt, Muntschaft, or mundium in German and gender-based guardianship in English, was never eliminated. It was reaffirmed with new vigor in the Early Modern period. 2 Because of it adult women had the same relationship to the institutions and procedures of law as did children or incompetent persons. Never were they on the same footing as adult males. They were, at least in legal theory, perpetually girls. 3
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarah Westphal (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 9 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: