Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied whether NS-398, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) enzyme inhibitor, and piroxicam, an inhibitor of COX-2 and the constitutively expressed COX-1, protect neurones against hypoxia/reoxygenation injury. Rat spinal cord cultures were exposed to hypoxia for 20 h followed by reoxygenation. Hypoxia/reoxygenation increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, which was inhibited by piroxicam (180-270 microM) and NS-398 (30 microM). Cell counts confirmed the neuroprotection. Western blotting revealed no COX-1 or COX-2 proteins even after hypoxia/reoxygenation. Production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a marker of COX activity, was barely measurable and piroxicam and NS-398 had no effect on the negligible PGE2 production. Hypoxia/reoxygenation increased nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) binding activity, which was inhibited by piroxicam but not by NS-398. AP-1 binding activity after hypoxia/reoxygenation was inhibited by piroxicam but strongly enhanced by NS-398. However, both COX inhibitors induced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in neurones and phosphorylation of heavy molecular weight neurofilaments, cytoskeletal substrates of ERK. It is concluded that piroxicam and NS-398 protect neurones against hypoxia/reperfusion. The protection is independent of COX activity and not solely explained by modulation of NF-kappaB and AP-1 binding activity. Instead, piroxicam and NS-398-induced phosphorylation through ERK pathway may contribute to the increased neuronal survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vartiainen et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: