Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigated the mechanism underlying oviposition habitat selection (OHS) in the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata . The putative outcome of a trade‐off between the risk of predation and detrimental density dependence, OHS in this species presents an opportunity to test two competing alternatives: (1) a polymorphic scenario, in which a fixed proportion of females constantly avoid ‘predator pools’, while the remainder oviposits at random; and (2) a monomorphic scenario, in which all females oviposit in predator pools with a certain probability. We present a conceptual framework that demonstrates how a simple experimental design – whereby predator incidence in artificial pools is alternated between 0.25 and 0.75 – can distinguish between, or refute, the two scenarios. Given the proportional use, by ovipositing females, of predator‐free pools observed under each treatment, and a bootstrap estimate of the ratio of daily oviposition rates, we find the monomorphic scenario twice as likely as the polymorphic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiflawi et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: