Why the study?
The mental health consequences of behavioral flexibility had not been examined in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Is behavioral flexibility associated with depression and anxiety in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Is behavioral flexibility associated with depression and anxiety in patients with cardiovascular disease?
Higher behavioral flexibility is independently associated with lower levels of depression over a 6-month period in patients with stable cardiovascular disease.
May flag depression risk in CVD patients; hypothesis-generating for flexibility-targeted interventions.
Objective: Being able to adapt to a changing environment has been associated with better mental and physical health. This adaptivity can be measured by behavioral flexibility assessment tools. However, the mental health consequences of behavioral flexibility have not been examined in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). The current study aims to examine if behavioral flexibility is associated with depression and anxiety in patients with CVD. Methods: A total of n = 387 patients with stable CVD were recruited as a part of the Do CHANGE study. At baseline, 3, and 6 months, data were collected. Depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7) were assessed at all time points. Results: The mean age of the sample was 61.9 ± 10.23 years, with 274 (71%) being male. An inverse association between behavioral flexibility and depression at baseline, 3, and 6 months was observed. The associations remained significant after adjusting for relevant demographic and medical variables and baseline depression. No longitudinal association between behavioral flexibility and anxiety was found in the multivariate models. Conclusions: Behavioral flexibility is associated with depression in cardiac patients. Future studies should focus on examining the pathways of this association and offering patients with low flexibility levels additional care if needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Habibović et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: