BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: (-)-Stepholidine has high affinity for dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. The aims of the present study were to examine the oral bioavailability and brain penetration of (-)-stepholidine and to gain understanding of mechanisms governing its transport across the enterohepatic barrier and the blood-brain barrier. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The pharmacokinetics of (-)-stepholidine was studied in rats and microdialysis was used to measure delivery to the brain. These studies were supported by biological measurement of unbound (-)-stepholidine. Membrane permeability was assessed using Caco-2 cell monolayers. Metabolite profiling of (-)-stepholidine in rat bile and plasma was performed. Finally, in vitro metabolic stability and metabolite profile of (-)-stepholidine were examined to compare species similarities and differences between rats and humans. KEY RESULTS: Orally administered (-)-stepholidine was rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract; two plasma concentration peaks were seen, and the second peak might result from enterohepatic circulation. Due to extensive pre-systemic metabolism, the oral bioavailability of (-)-stepholidine was poor (<2%). However, the compound was extensively transported across the blood-brain barrier, demonstrating an AUC (area under concentration-time curve) ratio of brain : plasma of approximately 0.7. (-)-Stepholidine showed good membrane permeability that was unaffected by P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2. In vitro (-)-stepholidine was metabolized predominantly by glucuronidation and sulphation in rats and humans, but oxidation of this substrate was very low. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Although (-)-stepholidine exhibits good brain penetration, future development efforts should aim at improving its oral bioavailability by protecting against pre-systemic glucuronidation or sulphation. In this regard, prodrug approaches may be useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: