Why the study?
Does heart synchronous whole-body vibration alter cardiac function compared to nonsynchronous vibration in dogs?
Does heart synchronous whole-body vibration alter cardiac function compared to nonsynchronous vibration in dogs?
Heart synchronous whole-body vibration can produce and maintain specific cardiovascular responses in a canine model.
May modify coronary flow and myocardial O2 consumption in dogs; leaves open human cardiac effects of synchronous vibration.
Changes in cardiac function produced by synchronizing vibration-induced forces with events in the cardiac cycle were compared to those for the nonsynchronous case in eight chronically instrumented, tranquilized dogs. The supine animals received sinusoidal, whole-body vibration (along the spinal +/- Gz axis) at a constant acceleration amplitude (+/- 0.75 G). The vibration frequency (2-3 Hz) was set equal to the paced heart frequency. Synchronization between vibration and cardiac cycles on a beat-by-beat basis produced a specific and sustained cardiovascular response; such a sustained response was not possible with nonsynchronous vibration. With synchronization, relationships could be found and sustained in which changes either exceeded or were below mean nonsynchronous levels, in some cases below previbration values. For the synchronous vs. nonsynchronous states, significant modification of cardiac function was reflected in parameters such as coronary flow (+15% to -34%) and myocardial oxygen consumption (+21% to -51%). Thus, whole-body oscillation acceleration (vibration) is a forcing function that can produce and maintain a particular cardiovascular response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharya et al. (1979) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: