In the present work, an algorithm for the numerical solution of the two-dimensional mass-weighted, ensemble- averaged, compressible Navier-Stokes equations is presented. Turbulence closure for the Reynolds stresses is obtained using a low-Reynolds-n umber two-equation k-s model, which includes near-wall effects. The same algorithm is used for the integration of both the Navier-Stokes and the turbulence-transport equations. The algorithm consists of a basic explicit finite-volume scheme, whose convergence is accelerated using local time-step- ping and multiple-grid techniques. Convergence is further enhanced by the use of an implicit-residual-smoothing technique, applied both in the fine and the coarser grids. The application of the numerical scheme to the solution of the k-s equations is examined in detail. Comparisons of computations with experimental data are presented for three shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction flows. Algorithm convergence rate and CPU-time require- ments are discussed. HE numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations for the simulation of turbulent flowfields is a subject of intense research and code development work.1 Interest is focused both on code applicability to variegated config- urations and on computational rapidity. Although direct simulation of turbulent flows2 or large-eddy numerical sim- ulations using subgrid-turbulence modeling 3'4 have appeared in the literature, current status of algorithm development and computer power indicate that for practical applications the ensemble-averaged Navier-Stokes equations should be used in conjunction with transport equations for turbulence closure.5'7 Algebraic or mixing-length models may provide satisfactory results for relatively simple flow geometries8 but require the determination of the shear-layer thickness and of the distance of each grid point from the solid boundary. Thus, they lack both geometric invariance and locality, which are highly desirable properties, from a computational viewpoint, when addressing complex flowfields with many interacting solid boundaries. Although research on Reynolds-stre ss-transport closure appears quite promising,9'10 its extension to three dimensions involves considerable increase of the number of transport equations to be solved. Also, further research con- cerning wall effects is required, the more so since the use of wall functions is considered inadequate.11 On the other hand, the use of two-equation closures, such as A>£, 12~14 is quite widespread. Notwithstanding the fact that the use of the Boussinesq hypothesis15 introduces a question- able simplification of the flow physics,16 the major drawback of the k-s model is probably the near-wall formulation which fails to reproduce correctly the effects of the solid boundary on turbulence. Several variants of the original Jones-Launder model12 have been developed in an attempt to improve upon near-wall modeling. Some ten such models have been thor- oughly examined in a critical review article by Patel et al., 17 who concluded that the models of Launder and Sharma,14
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
G. A. Gerolymos (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: