A Crossover Comparison of Continuous Insulin Infusion and Conventional Injection Treatment of Type I Diabetes

Helve E, Koivisto VA, Lehtonen A, Pelkonen R, Huttunen JK, NikkilÄ EA (Third Department of Medicine, University of Helsinki, and National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Finland). A crossover comparison of continuous insulin infusion and conventional injection treatment of type I diabetes. We evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy (CSII) as compared to conventional injection treatment (CIT) in an ordinary diabetic clinic in a one‐year randomized crossover study of 65 type I diabetic patients. Home blood glucose levels were lower during CSII (8.6±0.2 mmol/1, mean ± SEM) than during CIT (9.1±0.3 mmol/1, p <0.05). During the first six months, HbA 1 fell on CSII therapy (from 10.6±0.4 to 9.7±0.3%, p <0.001), whereas no change occurred during CIT. After the crossover, HbA 1 decreased again on CSII ( p <0.05), but rose in patients shifted from CSII to CIT ( p <0.05). The fall in glycosylated haemoglobin during CSII correlated with the initial HbA 1 level ( r =0.54, p <0.001). Ketoacidosis was more common during CSII (16 vs. 2 verified episodes). Hypoglycaemia occurred infrequently, without difference between CSII and CIT. Fifty‐six per cent of the patients preferred CSII after the study. In conclusion, while CSII slightly improves the metabolic control, the improvement in the unselected study population is less than previously reported among highly selected patients.