The rhetoric surrounding family-responsive policies in the workplace (e.g., employer-supported child care, parental leave, and employee-assistance programs) suggests that their purpose is to help workers achieve a healthy balance between work and family roles. The reality is, however, that many so-called family-responsive policies function as work supports to help ensure that workers continue to give priority to work over family. In this article, I reframe and clarify the goals of family-responsive policies. I examine these policies from a social policy perspective in order to identify new strategies for promoting a balanced life and to sort out the responsibilities of government, employers, and individuals in this emerging policy arena.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susan J. Lambert (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: