Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
KRAS was long deemed undruggable until the discovery of the switch-II pocket facilitated the development of specific KRAS inhibitors. Despite their introduction into clinical practice, resistance mechanisms can limit their effectiveness. Initially, tumors rely on mutant KRAS, but as they progress, they may shift to alternative pathways, resulting in intrinsic resistance. This resistance can stem from mechanisms like epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), YAP activation, or KEAP1 mutations. KRAS inhibition often triggers cellular rewiring to counteract therapeutic pressure. For instance, feedback reactivation of signaling pathways such as MAPK, mediated by receptor tyrosine kinases, supports tumor cell survival. Inhibiting KRAS disrupts protein homeostasis, but reactivation of MAPK or AKT can restore it, aiding tumor cell survival. KRAS inhibition also causes metabolic reprogramming and protein re-localization. The re-localization of E-cadherin and Scribble from the membrane to the cytosol causes YAP to translocate to the nucleus, where it drives MRAS transcription, leading to MAPK reactivation. Emerging evidence indicates that changes in cell identity, such as mucinous differentiation, shifts from alveolar type 2 to type 1 cells, or lineage switching from adenocarcinoma to squamous cell carcinoma, also contribute to resistance. In addition to these nongenetic mechanisms, secondary mutations in KRAS or alterations in upstream/downstream signaling proteins can cause acquired resistance. Secondary mutations in the switch-II pocket disrupt drug binding, and known oncogenic mutations affect drug efficacy. Overcoming these resistance mechanisms involves enhancing the efficacy of drugs targeting mutant KRAS, developing broad-spectrum inhibitors, combining therapies targeting multiple pathways, and integrating immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Tanaka et al. (Fri,) studied this question.