Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The model presented overcomes past inconsistencies by applying matching asymptotic techniques. The obtained growth rate, γ≈α(k)√kg-2kνₐ (where νₐ is the ablation velocity), could reproduce numerical simulations and experiments in a more complete way than the Takabe formula [Phys. Fluids 28, 3676 (1985)] γ=0.9√kg-3kνₐ. Here α(k)≡[1-(kkc)ʳ]1/2, represents the stabilization heat conduction effect and the cutoff wave number kc is much smaller than the inverse of the density scale length at the ablation front. Such a rigorously derived stabilization mechanism clarifies many of the numerical, analytical, and simulation results found in the literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Sanz (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: