This discussion playfully rereads liberalism as perversely as possible. Unless one takes this interpretative stance, the strange narratives and bizarre propositions of ordinary liberal reasoning play their usual tricks. In languages of objective value neutrality, liberal precepts begin lulling us into solemn acceptance of their alleged self-evidence; we are cast into the nebulous fogs of rational self-interest and left with little to say about their actual, proven, worth. A straight-up reading - meaning an interpretative stance acceptable perhaps to faithful readers of arcane scientific literatures in the American Politi
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy W. Luke (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: