Traditional decision-making techniques only deal with a limited type of uncertainty: that which can be foreseen sufficiently to be expressed as a number of alternate moves between which nature will choose. A plan is formulated which specifies how the decision-maker should respond to nature's moves. Such a plan makes no allowance for uncertainty which could not be foreseen. Unforeseeable uncertainty can only be dealt with if the decision-maker's response to nature's moves is not fixed in advance but is itself uncertain. Flexibility is then defined as the entropy of that uncertainty. It is a measure of both the number of alternative sequences of moves which are open to the decision-maker and his attitude to them. Robustness is a way of trading off flexibility against expected value as estimated under foreseeable uncertainty. The cost of flexibility may be estimated and controlled.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roger Pye (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: