Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Archaeologists use writing as an important method of communicating results and interpretations, but have only recently started to consider what this implies about their research, and the effect that any style of writing has on the intended audience. Whilst public interpretation has widened forms of discourse to include narrative, performance and biography, few such academic and professional outputs have been attempted in British post-medieval archaeology, although in the wider discipline of North American historical archaeology there has been some experimentation. It is argued that biography offers new ways of encountering data, as well as opening up different modes of interpretation and communication within professional and academic arenas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harold Mytum (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: