Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, I defend a view according to which one is responsible for one's actions to the extent that one has the ability to do the right thing for the right reasons. The view is asymmetrical in requiring the ability to do otherwise when one acts badly or for bad reasons, but no such ability in cases in which one acts well for good ones. Despite its intuitive appeal, the view's asymmetry makes it a target of both of the main camps in the debate over responsibility. In addressing objections, I explore the relationship between fairness and responsibility, and the nature of the ability to do otherwise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dana Kay Nelkin (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: