Although there are adequate numbers of figures the illustrations have been reduced to a minimum, presumably to keep down the cost and it is here that the only criticism can be made.Black and white reproductions of cells are never satisfactory; however one feels that greater attention could have been given to the quality of the photomicrographs chosen and to the way in which the legends were composed.Unfortunately not all of the photographs are typical examples of the abnormality to be demonstrated and it is hoped that if the publication goes into a second edition, as it probably will, that some improvement can be made.The size chosen by the publishers is unfortunate: it is neither a pocket book nor is it of standard textbook size.This may have been dictated by economy, but the material would have been enormously enhanced by being laid out on a larger page with a larger type.This book deserves to become a standard reference for all students in the clinical period.It would also form a useful addition to the library of junior medical staff in hospital.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J F Soothill (1971) studied this question.