Why the study?
Do non-palmar sites provide viable blood volume pulse and skin conductance measurements compared to palmar sites in response to cognitive and affective stimuli?
Do non-palmar sites provide viable blood volume pulse and skin conductance measurements compared to palmar sites in response to cognitive and affective stimuli?
Non-palmar sites such as toes, ears, and the arch of the foot may provide viable physiological signal measurements for affective computing, offering an alternative when palmar recordings are limited by motion artifacts.
Non-palmar sites may offer viable BVP and EDA alternatives; hypothesis-generating for affective computing and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Measurements of blood volume pulse (BVP) and skin conductance are commonly used as indications of psychological arousal in affective computing and human-machine interfaces. To date, palmar surfaces remain the primary site for these measurements. Placement of sensors on palmar surfaces, however, is undesirable when recordings are fraught with motion and pressure artifacts. These artifacts are frequent when the human participant has involuntary movements as in hyperkinetic cerebral palsy. This motivates the use of alternative measurement sites. The present study examined the correlation between measurements of blood volume pulse and skin conductance obtained from three different sites on the body (fingers, toes and ear for BVP; fingers, toes and arch of the foot for skin conductance) in response to cognitive and affective stimuli. The results of this pilot study indicated significant inter-site correlation among signal features derived from different sites, with the exception of BVP amplitude, the number of electrodermal reactions and the slope of the electrodermal activity response. We attribute these differences in part to inter-site discrepancies in local skin conditions, such as skin temperature. Despite these differences, significant changes from baseline were present in the responses to the cognitive and affective stimuli at non-palmar sites, suggesting that these sites may provide viable signal measurements for use in affective computing and human-machine interface applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kushki et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: