Why the study?
The mechanisms underlying the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors remain incompletely understood, and existing data on their modulation of cardiovascular autonomic function are contradictory.
Do SGLT2 inhibitors modulate cardiovascular autonomic function and reduce arrhythmic risk in patients with diabetes or heart failure?
Do SGLT2 inhibitors modulate cardiovascular autonomic function and reduce arrhythmic risk in patients with diabetes or heart failure?
This review highlights the potential of SGLT2 inhibitors to modulate cardiovascular autonomic function and reduce arrhythmic risk, while noting the need for further studies to clarify contradictory findings.
May support autonomic modulation as a mechanism for SGLT2i benefits in HF; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes not only in patients with diabetes but also in those with heart failure, irrespective of diabetic status. However, the mechanisms underlying the cardioprotective effects of these newer anti-diabetic drugs remain to be fully elucidated. One exciting avenue that has been recently explored in both preclinical and clinical studies is the modulation of the cardiovascular autonomic nervous system. A reduction in sympathetic nervous system activity by SGLT2 inhibitors may potentially translate into a reduction in arrhythmic risk and sudden arrhythmic death, which may explain, at least partly, the cardioprotection shown in the cardiovascular outcome trials with different SGLT2 inhibitors. Although some of the data from the preclinical and clinical studies are promising, overall the findings can be contradictory. This highlights the need for more studies to address gaps in our knowledge of these novel drugs. The present review offers an in depth overview of the existing literature regarding the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in modulating cardiovascular autonomic function as one of the possible pathways of their cardioprotective effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: