Why the study?
Diabetes self-management behaviors, health care access, and health perception needed description among Mexican adults and Hispanics residing in the Mexico-US border region.
There are significant differences in diabetes self-management behaviors and healthcare access between Hispanic adults in the US-Mexico border region and those in Monterrey, Mexico, highlighting gaps in evidence-based practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights disparities in glucose monitoring among border Hispanics; leaves open causal links to outcomes and interventions.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to describe diabetes self-management behaviors, diabetes health care access, and health perception for Mexican adults and Hispanics residing in the Mexico-US border region. Methods This study used data from the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey diabetes items (n = 26) to assess characteristics of Hispanics in 4 Arizona border counties (n = 216) and cross-sectional data from a modified BRFSS in a convenience sample of adults residing in Monterrey, Mexico (n = 351). Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics with SPSS. Results The Mexico cohort was younger than the Arizona cohort (59.36 [11.5] vs 65.54 [11.1], respectively) and the mean length of time with type 2 diabetes was similar. Less than 10% (9.7%) of the Arizona cohort reported never monitoring blood glucose compared to 22.5% of the Mexico cohort. The mean (SD) number of times in the past 12 months the Mexico cohort saw their health care provider was 9.09 (6.8) vs 4.49 (8.3) for the Arizona cohort. Despite provider access, there were differences in self-management behaviors between the cohorts. Conclusions Due to environmental and policy factors in the Mexico-US border region, there continues to be a gap in evidence-based practice and uptake of self-management behaviors for adults with diabetes. Resources such as the BRFSS and shared practice guidelines would bridge this gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McEwen et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: