This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The article introduces a new Hirsch-type index for a scientist. This so-called pure h-index, denoted by hP, takes the actual number of coauthors, and the scientist’s relative position in the byline into account. The transformation from h to hP can also be applied to the R-index, leading to the pure R-index, denoted as RP. This index takes the number of collaborators, possibly the rank in the byline and the actual number of citations into account.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: