This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We have previously shown that rat allo-selective cells of the CD2+CD5- phenotype were generated in Brown Norway (BN) rats after immunization with allogeneic Wistar/Furth (WF) cells, whereas immunization with semi-allogeneic F1 (WF/BN) cells generated CD2+CD5+ effector T cells. We now report that the allo-selective CD2+CD5- lymphocytes lacked expression of intact CD3 complexes and expressed NKR-P1 molecules although lower as compared to classical NK cells, implicating that these lymphocytes constitute a subset of NK cells. The CD5+ T cells were not cytolytically active in BN rats immunized with WF cells indicating an intersubset regulation with mutually exclusive activation of either allo-selective T cells or allo-selective NK cells. Cold target inhibition showed that lysis of both allogeneic target cells and NK-sensitive target cells was mediated by the same NKR-P1 intermediate effector cells. These NK cells lysed WF but not allogeneic Fischer 344 or autologous BN target cells, indicating selective recognition of an allogeneic determinant. Semiallogeneic F1 (WF/BN) target cells were not lysed. Furthermore, target cells from F1 (WF/BN) x WF back-cross hybrids lacking expression of RT1n (self-MHC class I) were susceptible to lysis, whereas back-cross hybrids expressing RT1n were protected from lysis, indicating that self-MHC molecules conferred protection from lysis. These findings implicate the existence of NKR-P1intermediate and NKR-P1high NK cell subsets with different regulation and function in vivo.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ericsson et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: