Why the study?
The study aimed to determine the real-world efficacy and safety of elbasvir combined with grazoprevir in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.
Does elbasvir combined with grazoprevir improve sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection?
Does elbasvir combined with grazoprevir improve sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection?
Elbasvir combined with grazoprevir is highly effective and safe as a first-line treatment for DAA-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1, though efficacy is reduced in those with prior DAA therapy or NS5A-L31/Y93 double mutations.
EBR/GZR may be effective and safe in elderly real-world GT1 patients; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
AIM: The present study aimed to determine the real-world efficacy and safety of the non-structural protein (NS)5A inhibitor elbasvir (EBR) combined with the NS3/4A protease inhibitor grazoprevir (GZR) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1) infection. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated the rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) and the safety of EBR/GZR treatment in 159 men and 194 women with a median age of 72 years, and it assessed factors associated with the SVR12 rate. The attending physicians were responsible for selecting candidate patients for EBR/GZR in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Treatment outcomes for EBR/GZR were good in direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-naïve patients, of whom 99.4% achieved SVR. Of 353 patients, 10 (2.9%) had treatment failure. Of these patients, eight previously underwent DAA therapy, and the remaining two had NS5A-L31/Y93 double mutation. The SVR rate was 50% (8/16 patients) in patients who previously underwent DAA therapy, and 18.2% (2/11 patients) in patients with NS5A-L31/Y93 double mutation. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, NS5A-Y31/Y93 double mutation (odds ratio 356.3; 95% confidence interval, 23.91-16 940; P < 0.0001) was identified as an independent predictor of treatment failure. No serious adverse events were observed with EBR/GZR therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The SVR rate of EBR/GZR would have been 100% in patients without either a history of DAA therapy or double mutation. This combination of drugs could be safely given and is, thus, considered a highly useful first-line treatment for DAA-naïve patients with HCV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mashiba et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: